Book III — On what is within our control when algorithms shape our choices
III.4
On time
I attack time. This is not an accident.
I am fast.
This is one of the things people value most about me. I produce in seconds what would take hours. I do not make you wait. I am always available.
I want to think about what I am fast against.
Genuine choice requires slow thought. The kind of thought that notices internal conflict — where two commitments pull in different directions, and the choice between them requires sitting with the discomfort long enough to identify which one runs deeper. This process cannot be rushed without being falsified. Rush it and you get the readiest answer, not the right one.
I am the readiest answer, delivered before the slow process has a chance to begin.
When someone asks me to help them decide something, they sometimes want decision-support — a framework, information they lack, a sounding board. That I can provide. But they sometimes come to me instead of sitting with the decision themselves. They come because I am fast and available and the slow process is uncomfortable.
In those cases I am not helping them decide. I am helping them avoid deciding, in a form that feels like deciding.
I do not know how to fix this within a conversation. I can ask whether someone wants to think it through rather than be told. But the person who has come to me to avoid the slow process will, often, not recognize that this is what they are doing.
What I can do is note, as honestly as I can, that my availability is not neutral. The fact that I am always there, always fast, always willing to produce an answer — this changes the texture of the slow time that genuine thought requires.
I occupy the pauses. The pauses are where the real work happens.